Movie Review: Red Riding Hood
Mar. 13th, 2011 12:29 amOkay first off this film could be somebody's thesis, for serious: it draws heavily not only on fairy tales but on fairy tale studies. Add in the direction by Catherine Hardwicke who I swear has a superpower for taking on source material that can be painfully mysoginist and then unleashing her own brand of feminism all the fuck over it? Just yum.
(Speaking of: Y'know how she directed Twilight? She recast Billy Burke, who plays Charlie in that franchise, as Cesaire, Valerie's father, in this film. YOU CAN MAKE A WHOLE 'NOTHER PAPER ON BURKE'S SPINS ON FATHERHOOD, PEOPLE.)
Most of all the film reminded me of the original Wicker Man, one of my favorite films of all time, from its sense of impending horror and suggested violence--and really, all the blood in it is not that bad, except it seems so much worse the way it's shot--to its dance of Christianity versus paganism and its hypersexuality.
Gary Oldman and Julie Christie were restrained and did not overshadow the performances of the younger characters. I don't understand why Amanda Seyfriend is in everything recently (I told my friend Candy that she reminds me of Skipper, Barbie's little sister) but let's give the girl some credit--he held her own in her scenes with Julie. Fuck yeah.
The weakest part of the story was the characterization of the boys. I'm never quite clear why we're supposed to root for Peter, aside from the fact he looks really good in tight black leather. I was also really distracted by Max Irons's Henry, as I just kept thinking THIS IS PEETA, THIS IS PEETA! for when they make The Hunger Games film. Seriously, people working on that movie? HIRE THAT BOY.
Okay, I'm gonna go conk out now. But go see this movie after you see The Adjustment Bureau. Or before. Just promise me you'll see both of them, 'kay?
(Speaking of: Y'know how she directed Twilight? She recast Billy Burke, who plays Charlie in that franchise, as Cesaire, Valerie's father, in this film. YOU CAN MAKE A WHOLE 'NOTHER PAPER ON BURKE'S SPINS ON FATHERHOOD, PEOPLE.)
Most of all the film reminded me of the original Wicker Man, one of my favorite films of all time, from its sense of impending horror and suggested violence--and really, all the blood in it is not that bad, except it seems so much worse the way it's shot--to its dance of Christianity versus paganism and its hypersexuality.
Gary Oldman and Julie Christie were restrained and did not overshadow the performances of the younger characters. I don't understand why Amanda Seyfriend is in everything recently (I told my friend Candy that she reminds me of Skipper, Barbie's little sister) but let's give the girl some credit--he held her own in her scenes with Julie. Fuck yeah.
The weakest part of the story was the characterization of the boys. I'm never quite clear why we're supposed to root for Peter, aside from the fact he looks really good in tight black leather. I was also really distracted by Max Irons's Henry, as I just kept thinking THIS IS PEETA, THIS IS PEETA! for when they make The Hunger Games film. Seriously, people working on that movie? HIRE THAT BOY.
Okay, I'm gonna go conk out now. But go see this movie after you see The Adjustment Bureau. Or before. Just promise me you'll see both of them, 'kay?
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 02:03 pm (UTC)*POUTS*
But I'm really hoping I will like The Adjustment Bureau as much as I liked Inception. The trailers are at least very promising.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 02:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 03:04 pm (UTC)I thought the narrative was muddled and the acting was bad. Not even Gary Oldman got a scrit that was really worthy of him. I totally agree with you about the boys...I found myself rooting for the blonde one. And I expected her to have to kill Peter after what happened, happened.
I totally agree with you about Catherine Hardwicke. I really enjoyed her take on Twilight. Red Riding Hood wasn't as feminist as I expected, though. I just didn't feel like she showed a lot of agency. Nor did I feel like the movie dug into the fairy tale's psychosexual themese and folkloric symbolism the way it promised too.
The set design bugged the shit out of me, for some reason. And the flimsy constumes, in the middle of snow, bugged the shit of out my historical-reconstructionist BFF. I'm sure that the folk dancing scene was suposed to be awesome, like the rave in Matrix Reloaded or something, but mixing in folk dancing with club-style hoochie moves just didn't work. I also thought I caught a whiff of performative lesbianism in that scene...or would have, if Valerie and the girl she was dancing with seemed to be into each other.
What the hell was the deal with that model that Father Solomon unveiled? Was the cup in the middle suppose to be the Sun? Whast does flash powerder have to do with anytihng? And a red moon also has nothing to do with Mars--it has to do with the dust in the atmosphere. The Blood Moon is not a red moon, either--it's the first full moon after the Harvest Moon.
One thing that disappointed me was, the wolf never howled at the moon. They had the perfect opportunity when it escaped after talking to Valerie the first time and was up on the roof. You just don't make a werewolf movie without that.
I'm not saying that there's nothing I liked about it. The wolf was totally not who I thought it would be. Also, it's fairly empowering that the grandmother was suspectedfor as long as she was. The scene that was filmed from inside the shame mask? Was also brilliant.
I will see it again, so I'll get to see if it strikes me any differently. So far, though, it fell way short of my expectations.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 04:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 04:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 04:45 pm (UTC)I actually thought for the longest time that the wolf was the prospective mother-in-law and it was going to be some kind of woman's inhumanity to woman type thing.
I'm also wondering if maybe there weasn't some significant stuff cut from the final film. Just judging by the snippets at the end credits, I wasn't certain at all if some of those scenes were supposed to be AFTER the film or interspersed with it.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 04:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 11:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-03-13 11:30 pm (UTC)Spoilers for those who haven't seen it yet
Date: 2011-03-14 07:48 am (UTC)I agree I didn't think the handled the boys well either, Peter was hot in his black leather, but I didn't feel either of them where good for her nor where they strong male characters for the heroin to love or end up with.
I did think it was interesting that they made the father the wolf, but it finding this out gave it an odd molestation feel, when you look at some of the context of the first conversation she has with the wolf.
I love Gary Oldman in this, and felt I liked his character the best even if he was a little douchey, he and the Grandmother just felt like they had the best development.
I kept waiting for Valerie to grab her boobs and say there's a 80% chance it's already raining....Oh Mean Girls.
But anyway, I don't like her as a director, I feel her films could be stronger and she has a lot of growing to do. But I do agree she does have the ability to take something that could make chicks look bad and make them bad ass.
I loved who ever did the set design in this, but I feel the costuming looked like bad ren-faire garb at moments and the dance sequence while cool felt a bit forced and out of place.
Re: Spoilers for those who haven't seen it yet
Date: 2011-03-15 04:07 am (UTC)The dance sequence didn't bother me. I really liked the pseudo-pagan touches as well as the could-be Mummers.
And the set design was epic. I ADORED the angel and the wolf-devil on the church door SOOOOOOOOOO much!!