caitri: (Screw Subtext)
We observed the Fourth by watching Sinners and making Mexican food.

Sinners is also the best movie I have seen since Barbie. 12/10, no notes. Please Ryan Coogler, make more movies where Michael B Jordan kills white supremacists. I think that would do wonders for everyone.
caitri: (World Is a Mess)
 Scott's review of Dune: "And THAT's what you get for messing with an ecologist!"
I thought it was very well done, the best version yet, but--it irks me a bit that this is the third version we've seen when there's so much that hasn't been adapted. I kept thinking of the 2000 SciFi version which was a solid version that suffered only from tv budgeting. I spent a chunk of the movie thinking about other things that could have been done and just getting annoyed. This is why canons are difficult to update because the returning insistence on what things "should" look like.
(I sat there thinking if they went for some stuff from the same period. Samuel L. Delaney: Too much sex and drugs. Anne McCaffrey: Too much sex and also the main character is a woman. Marion Zimmer Bradley: Cancelled because pedobear, but man the stuff she did on how colonialism fucks people over was good.)
Also, one thing I did not expect was how the film underlines what a Mess Paul is. I've seen some reviews from folks who have not touched the books, or only the first one, and like. Paul is the opposite of a white savior. Paul is a case study in how well-meaning colonialism is still colonialism and everything goes SO poorly.
I was irked that they made Jessica much weaker. Herbert's women characters are always awful: You can be a "good" wife/mother/concubine OR you can be crazy and/or incesty. I mean.
Also, it struck me that while everyone was pleased with racebending Liet Kynes, why the hell they left the problematic af Yueh. You have one (1) Asian character and he's the betrayer who dies pathetically. In related news why the fuck did they even bother to get Chang Chen WHO DESERVED SO MUCH BETTER than five lines and a lil polkadot on his forehead. I mean I hope he got a good check but WTF.
caitri: (Mouse Herat)
 What is time even, really?

I continue my schedule. Of all things my diss work prepared me for quarantine; aside from the inability to nip put for coffee or library books, it's pretty similar. For better or for worse I'm not feeling as dispirited as others are, as near as I can tell. I'm not writing as much as I would like, but that's about par for the course. 

~

We watched Cats the other night. Honestly, aside from the peculiar decisions of costuming and uncanny valleys, it doesn't have a patch on other terrible films I've seen. (Will anything ever be as bad as Highlander 2? I mean, really?) We also watched Battle Angel Alita, which is best characterized as "James Cameron's Issues With Women as Directed by Robert Rodriguez."
caitri: (Chris Vocabulary)
I finally sat down to watch it--the whole thing, not just the, uh, highlights.

So I actually enjoyed it way more than I was expecting, since it was billed as so gritty, much grimdark. I could have lived without the blood and viscera, though, it is true.

What surprised me was the romance plot, which was incredibly incredibly sweet. Following from A Wrinkle in Time, CFine plays another DILF, albeit with a bad haircut and a passable Scottish accent. He's been widowed for several years and has an incredibly cute munchkin. (And actually his character's interactions with small children throughout are always well done. My favorite is the little girl who brings him a shovel and says that her mom said for him to give it back as soon as he's done with it--she's so embarrassed, it's adorbs.) He gets pushed into marrying King Edward's goddaughter Elizabeth, a character who frankly needed a movie of her own, because what we get here is cherce. Sure she's been pushed into what could end up being a loveless marriage, and her new husband doesn't want to fuck her on their wedding night, but she's damn well going to be a Solid Heroine. She's kind to the cute munchkin, sticks up for her new people, and calls bullshit when she sees it. I love her so. much.

And therefore it's a pity that she gets the most abbreviated love scene ever. Sure she gets to be nekkid with CFine, including having to keep her legs angled to preserve his dignity, such as it is, but like... Okay. Having established that they have not fucked so far, but in recognition that he might be killed in battle the next day, they decide to Get It On. Getting it on involves them taking their clothes off, getting into bed, some giggling, and immediate penetration followed by orgasms. Now I know I have been spoiled by Outlander but I just sat there thinking, "Well that's just disappointing." Also, that poor girl. She's a virgin, she has three minutes of sexy time, and then has to spend ages avoiding death and imprisonment and such. Their reunion at the end is very well done, but they needed some ... dialogue, maybe, as opposed to sunny, relieved smiles.

The other thing I liked about this film was that Edward II is...actually portrayed as way more competent than one would have thought. And though Piers is there for, like, a second, they do not go into the gayness at all--which I imagine is meant to be some sensitivity since you're supposed to hate him. Way more time is spent on his daddy issues and his just generally being shown up by Robert, since they've known each other since they were kids.

Anyway, it was a good film to watch once. All subsequent viewings will be fast-forwarded until I get to the romance bits and the nude scenes. Sorry not sorry!
caitri: (Chris Vocabulary)
I read The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society when it first came out ten years ago, and it quickly became one of my favorite comfort reads. It's a story about survival and recovery, and above all about the power of reading to bring people together. The film version, produced by Netflix, only got about half of that.

The story starts in 1946 London, as the city and the world recover from WW2. Our main character is Juliet, a newspaper columnist whose collection of articles has just been released in book form; it is a popular book that is doing much, much better than her study of Anne Bronte did years before. Casting about for what to do next, she gets a letter from Dawsey Adams in Guernsey, who has purchased a book that once belonged to her and is writing (her address is in the book, and she has only very recently moved) to ask for help in finding a bookshop so he can buy a copy of Charles & Mary Lamb's Tales from Shakespeare.

This is where I sat up and grumped, "It wasn't Tales from Shakespeare, it was More Essays of Elia and a biography!" But this is why I don't have many friends and live on the internet. ANYWAY.

Charmed, Juliet sends him a copy of the book and the two strike up a correspondence. Letters with Dawsey make up for the middling romance with a wealthy American. (One thing I do appreciate is that in the film version Dawsey is hella hot.) Juliet decides to go to Guernsey and meet everyone she's been reading about in Dawsey's letters and write an article on the power of reading!!!!!!!!!

And then she gets to Guernsey and everyone is hella secretive and kinda weird and wary of her.

In the book, she has corresponded with everyone for months and they are all delighted to have her, and it's all about these kindred spirits coming together.

I feel the difference has something to do with shifting perceptions of journalists in 20fucking18 but what do I know.

Anyway Juliet wants to Solve the Mystery of What Happened to Elizabeth McKenna. As a reader of the book, you're like "Well someone got sent to a concentration camp during WW2, I'm pretty sure I know how this ends." As a viewer, it's not that different, even though all the characters are like "WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR HER TO COME HOME."

(FWIW in the book there is a gay Jewish character sent to the camps as well who survives and is already back home. He is totally deleted from the film which puzzles me a little and pisses me off a lot.)

Dawsey is the primary caretaker of Elizabeth's adorable kid, who Juliet also finds adorable, but she's all "WHO IS THE FATHER?????" Which we know early on in the book. There's no mystery. Why the screenplay writer decided they needed so many ~~mysteries~~ instead of just getting on with the story bewilders me, unless/probably they decided that people just talking about BOOKS would be too dull....in which case, why adapt THIS BOOK?

I digress. Middling American is charged with finding the missing Elizabeth because Americans have Google, or something. So Juliet gets to tell everyone that Elizabeth was executed and it goes exactly as well as you'd expect.

In the book, one of Elizabeth's fellow prisoners wrote to them, and there's a whole subplot about another survivor named Remy coming to Guernsey and trying to build a new life for herself, and everyone trying to help but good intentions not being enough, so she goes back to France to a program that will help her and other survivors. It was a good subplot about the difficulties of trauma, and it's a bummer the whole thing was cut.

(Also cut was a whole subplot about Oscar Wilde letters, which was adorable but kind of an odd thing to introduce in the final act.)

The rest of the film is about Juliet finally deciding to dump Middling American. In fairness, his offences in the book are altogether missing; it's clear he's a controlling, arrogant ass, and by the time he tells Juliet she shouldn't be taking care of Adorable Kid she's over with him and you're cheering her on as she tells him off. Why they cut THAT scene is beyond me. In the movie she .... just isn't into him. She IS into hella hot Dawsey, and since he IS hella hot you're like, what are you even waiting for? In the book Dawsey isn't hella hot, but he is a quiet, thoughtful and charming person, and Juliet is taken with him immediately but is convinced he has a thing for Remy. Both end with Juliet going to propose to Dawsey, who says "Oh God, yes!" and its adorbs. The movie does end with a lovely denoument of a picnic where Dawsey reads them Lamb aloud to Adorable Child and to Juliet.

So basically what we have is a movie where people who have a love of reading are suspicious of a writer, the books that are central to so much are largely eliminated, the worst parts of WW2 are likewise eliminated, and the Asshole American is toned way the fuck down.

I am left irked. Irked, I say!
caitri: (Default)
 I was underwhelmed because I had just finished reading the book. It's very pretty? And I like what they did with diversity in casting and stuff, but....they Hollywoodized the fuck out of it.

I also spent too much time making it a really weird Padme/Poe time travel AU in my mind. >_>
caitri: (Books)
 We've gotten a month-long subscription to HBO so Scott can mainline Westworld, but the first thing we actually did was watch Fahrenheit 451 starring Michael B. Jordan.

This version of Bradbury's classic is very much updated for our present political moment; not only is media consumption and drug use state-sanctioned, but so is social media/live news feeds. Takes place in some near-future after a Second Civil War has left 8 million dead and people are happily in thrall to limited knowledge. Resistance leads to loss of citizenship and vulnerability to state violence. So far, so too too familiar.

Clarice is transformed from an ingenue to a non-citizen who is creeped on by Michael Shannon's Beatty and loved by Jordan's Montag. She and Montag read Dostoyevsky in her shitty apartment and fall in love, and she eventually leads him to the other rebels who are also the living books themselves.

This leads to a significant plot deviation, one that I'm not sure works. In addition to memorizing books with each person taking on the identity of a book, they have also been scanning them and *handwave* encoding them in a strand of DNA called OMNIS that they inject into a bird. The climax is the bird flying to freedom across picturesque vistas and joining a giant flock as they weave beautiful pictures into the sunset, because the DNA can also move to other animals and humanity's knowledge will be preserved in the natural world while also being sent to Canada.

Except that was when Scott pointed out that if people were escaping to Canada anyway, what happened to Canada's books??

That aside, I can't say enough good things about Jordan and Shannon's acting. They did an exceptionally convincing job of friends/father-son relationship where genuine love is at war with obedience to state and self. Also they were slashy af and I kinda want to go looking for fic. >_>
caitri: by blue_hobbit (Don't Go Where I Can't Follow)
...which I just described to someone as "like Kurosawa's Ran but with white and brown people."

I'll be okay. ... later.
caitri: (Gamora)
Tonight we tried to watch the Hamildoc but it seems that either the fandom swamped the stream and broke PBS or the DOS attacks were involved. (FWIW the issue I had was in buffering, so I only saw maybe two minutes of synced sound and video....whev, I'll watch it tomorrow. Sigh.)

Anyway, instead we watched Warcraft, or at least I did (Scott fell asleep pretty quickly), and....it turns out I have A LOT of feels about it. Like, if you look past the uneven CGI and the messy script (like, seriously, did anyone who doesn't play the game understand half of what was going on?), it does a lot of things rather brilliantly: it manages to have several women characters, none of whom are objectified or abused; it shows how sometimes pretty much everyone can be doing something for the right reasons and how often this actually works out badly; rather bravely it manages to take a fantasy summer popcorn film and make it an actual tragedy. That is no small thing.

The thing that struck me, too, is how it pretty much does all the things that Game of Thrones (books and tv) are lauded for, in terms of gritty storytelling and realism and so on, and manages to do so **without** boobies, rape, incest, extended torture sequences, some more rape, and problematic white saviorness. (Although we could have some interesting discussions about how race is codified in other ways, there are actually more POC in Stormwind than there are in Star Trek. Which is a whole other kettle, but anyway.) The final big battle scene isn't Ran, but we nonetheless watch most of the characters we have come to care about die and--this is the kicker--it isn't cool at all. It's *sad.* It's *sad* when Draka dies to save her baby, it's *sad* when Durotan chooses to let Guldan kill him so people will turn against Guldan (and it doesn't even WORK!), it's *sad* when Llane asks Garona to kill him so that she can survive and work for peace within the Horde. People complained about how the fight scenes weren't cool, and....I kind of think that was the point. War is awful and people die and that's awful.

You see this in the game, too, but I also like how the narrative shifts between sides so that it starts out "For the Horde", blends in the middle, and ends in "For the Alliance." I thought that was a lovely bit of bookending that also made its point about how each side has both heroes and villains, and the whole shades of grey thing. There are a couple of scenes where Garona Halforcen acts as translator, and when POV shifts the highlighted speaker is heard in English that sort of emphasizes who sees themselves as heroes in a given moment. (And I have feels about Garona acting in a liminal space too, and how that was done. Like, a lot of them.)

TL;DR Warcraft was surprisingly complex and I liked it a lot, especially the gratuitous scene when Khadgar turned an NPC into a sheep, because I haven't seen low-level spells like that in ages.
caitri: (Hawkeye)
I went twice before I sat down to write, so: TL;DR I REALLY LIKED IT AND I HAVE A LOT OF FEELS.

All of the spoilers, with analysis )

Um, I think that's it. That's a lot. But yeah. so. Many. FEELS!
caitri: (Is this a kissing book?)

Went with a gang of folks to go see The Imitation Game yesterday. I'd put off going because I'd read a negative review from a source I typically trust (which, I don't even remember where now). Anyway, I was pleasantly surprised; though it's a bit clunky, there's some genuinely good writing in there too. The theme of comprehension and communication especially, though it falls a bit short as the writers/Cumberbatch portray Turing as someone more or less on the high-end if the autism/AS spectrum. There's a bit when bb!Turing is given a book on ciphers from his bestie/child beloved who explains that ciphers are a way of sending messages where you say something but mean something different. Turing counters, "But ALL talking is like that. Everyone says something and means something else, and you're supposed to just know what they really mean!"

[Also: That awkward moment when you feel the only person who could understand you is this fictionalized gay computer programmer. Oy.]

The friendship/love between Turing and the sole woman [as depicted in the film] on the team, Joan (Keira Knightley), is also very well done. Joan is portrayed as basically the first friend/confident Turing has had since he was like ten. When her parents demand she come home--because of course they don't know she's off saving the world--Turing panics and proposes marriage to keep her there, then angsts about it because he's gay. This is one of those moments where the chemistry is all wrong; particularly as played he feels way more ace than gay, especially in the scene where one of the guys is basically like "dude, I know your homosexual, not gonna judge" and I relaly felt that THAT scene would have been much better with some sexual chemistry between the two. (Especially since dude later says he'll happily blackmail Turing if Turing reveals he's a spy. That double-betrayal could have been so. much. better.) Turing eventually tells Joan he can't marry her because gay, and she's like, "So? I know that. You're also the only one who respects me for my mind and I am INTO THAT and we can actually be quite happy together in these deeply sucky and repressive 1940s and 1950s" and Turing is still like, "No! [I really want to save you from blackmail and spying and stuff because I love you too much to let that happen, also you're a woman, so.] GAY GAY GAY!" And then in the end when he's all quivery because of hormone treatments from the chemical castration and stuff she tries to take care of him and it feels awkward.

Also, they criminally underused Charles Dance. Like, Tywin Lannister is freaking awesome, why give him some glowery moments and then basically lose him for the entire last third for no apparent reason? He comes in to turn off and bash the Turing machine and there's a heavy moment where all the other cryptographers come in and say, "If he's fired! I quit!" and they are all left alone because they can't lose their best cryptographers. (At this point in the theater I turned to Scott and whispered, "Good thing they weren't under the Bush administration, huh?")

Mark Strong was also awesome. This is one of his rare moments of playing a scary Good Guy, and--he's very good at it. His MI6 Officer discussions with Turing are always great. "Oh, so and so's not in prison, I just wanted to see what you'd do. Here, take this, there's a thing to do." And he disappears in the end too; as one of my friends asked, why didn't he come back to save Turing in the end? Ah, right, fiction.

In short, it was clunky but well done, and it's nice to have a true and difficult story told to a broader audience. Turing is treated as bit of a martyr--again, rather awkwardly, as one friend noted that they mention the other 49,000 people who were jailed and chemically castrated for being gay, but Turing was the one that MATTERED because HERO. Interesting audience, too; we were like a group of eight thirty-somethings and I swear everyone else in that nearly full theater were in the 50-80 range. I feel like this says something but I'm not sure what.

caitri: (Charles mouse)
Spoiler alert, just so you're aware--Smaug is actually Khan.

But seriously, folks )

In conclusion, I LIKED IT A LOT AND I HAVE FEELINGS.

ETA: Signalboosting The World Hobbit Project, a massive fan study about response to PJ's films. Please take 10-20 minutes to help academics really get what makes fans tick!
caitri: (Charles mouse)
We went to go see Hector and the Search for Happiness because it stars Simon Pegg. I read the book a few years ago and thought it was a pleasant trifle; somehow the subtle racism of it was less annoying because French. The short version of the story is, middle-aged emotionally retarded white dude travels the world and a number of exotic brown people explain to him that happiness is love and family and stuff.

This sounds terrible but it's not because Simon Pegg. Simon Pegg is fucking AMAZING in this movie and I would like to nominate him to replace Benedict Cumberbatch as The Guy In All the Things.

The cute and charming bits I expected, the dramatic bits not so much. While most of the film is light and fluffy, there are a number of scenes that are intense or just emotionally heartbreaking, and did I mention that Simon Pegg is fucking amazing? Because he's fucking amazing in this, he'll make you laugh and then he'll make you cry and then you end up laughing and crying AT THE SAME TIME because cf. Simon Pegg is fucking amazing and he needs to be in All the Things.
caitri: (The Hammer is my Penis)
The Maze Runner is probably better than it has a right to be, but it's still not that good. (I mean, I know the lead actor can actually act, I've seen him do it on Teen Wolf, but man, talk about forcing an emotional range of A to B on him!) I kinda gave up ten minutes in and played "What's that source?" for the rest of the movie. "Oh, that came from Lord of the Flies. Oh, that came from Ender's Game, Oh, that came from Hunger Games. Oh, that came from Serenity." Etc. YAopoly would make a pretty nice party game, actually.

Actually the best part was the number of POC in it, including main roles. So, there's that. Tiny niblets of hope and all that.
caitri: (Casablanca Karl)
We went to go see Sin City 2 tonight and I've been thinking about it; it's not as bad as I had heard from reviews, it's--just not good either. I've been thinking about why that is; one reason is that the pacing and the story structure are messy and it just isn't coherent, and the other is that it's rather flat.

One of the best things about the original film, I thought, was how it interwove three different narratives together and then bookended them with minor characters. This film doesn't do that at all, though it tries, I guess? There are three main narratives, that intertwine slightly--which is to say, you see elements in each of them that kind of foreshadow the next one; kind of like Cloud Atlas but not really (and Cloud Atlas was a mess too, but a glorious one). But each story seems to fall just short of what it could have been: I honestly didn't get the point of Marv's story in the beginning, and kept waiting for something to happen that would conclude it; it took me way longer than I should have to realize who Dwight was (not helped by the fact that Josh Brolin replaced Clive Owen, and the characterization was different enough that they might as well have been different characters anyway); Johnny/Joseph Gordon-Levitt's story was okay, I guess; Nancy's story, the one Miller wrote specifically for this film was utterly bland.

Let me back up a little. I read all of the Sin City books in a rush years ago and ate them like candy. Their greatest strength was how they were such a great pastiche of the old crime and noir stories and comics of the forties and fifties. That they all took place in some menacing Anytown, USA, "Sin City," that was both totally retro and totally contemporary, made sense: they were about pain and rage and in some real sense a kind of impotence--an acknowledgement that things would never change but a determination to go down fighting anyway.

Sin City 2 doesn't have that quality. It doesn't even have the pain or the rage. We laughed at a fair bit of the dialogue when it edged over from noir into outright parody; we laughed at several of the sex scenes for this same reason. Way to take Eva Green and nudity and make it funny, gentlemen. Wtf.

That said, there was a lovely image of Green swimming nude that was shot in a very art deco sort of fashion that was very lovely; especially when you see her in silhouette before a full moon, ready to dive, and she looks very much like the goddess Manute says she is.

Also, Manute made me miss Michael Clarke Duncan, may he RIP. I went nuts trying to figure out where I know the replacement actor from; turns out he was the All-State Man. I was amused.

Anyway, I kind of hope Rodriguez ends up doing another cut for dvd. I feel like there was a good film buried in this one, and I'd like to see it.
caitri: (Cait Yatta!)
Okay, so I was one of the people deeply dubious of James Gunn directing because of his problematic history with women characters. I sort of imagined that Joss Whedon had a sit down with him beforehand and was like, "Strong women or bust, minion!" and Gunn was all "Aye aye, sir!" In short, you know how women in the Marvel!verse tend to be awesome? YES! So I'm going to focus on that for this review, because the film itself is unapologetic cheeseball space opera. I'm not complaining about that, btw--space opera is something we have needed for a LONG time. (Especially underscored by the tediously long snorefest trailer for Interstellar that proceeded this movie. Oy. If it spends more than twenty minutes in space I'll be surprised. Anyhow. Here, have my feels:

*Gamora

Okay, so I unabashedly love Zoe Saldana, and while she wasn't given a whole lot to work with here, let me tell you what sets her apart. She's set up for the villain to become a good guy trope, and you know what? She does that all on her own. SELF-RESCUING PRINCESS YOU GUYS. Starlord doesn't awaken nascent feelings of good in her, she doesn't become a good guy because of the love of a good man, she is ALREADY A GOOD GUY who finds the crushing Terran bewildering and annoying and, eventually, cute, because he IS a good guy and she hasn't seen one of those before. Also, the shirtless scene from the promos? Totally not in this film.

*Nebula

We see very little of her, and though the adverts set up her and Gamora against each other, it's not...actually a huge thing. And actually, she herself is characterized similarly to Gamora, in that she too is making her decisions based on her desire for vengeance etc. and not because of daddy issues and whatnot. The fight between them is brief and nonsexualized, and they absolutely set it up for her to come back later.

*Nova Prime

Glen Close has a very small role here, but still bigger than Benicio del Toro's. She's in charge of the Nova Corps, and briefly: She always makes the right decisions and all of the men under her command (and its overwhelmingly men under her command, esp. with the pilots) follow her orders without question and to the end. Which, on the one hand, this is a small thing, on the other--how often do we really see women in power like that in films? Or hell, on tv? Not that often.

*Rocket

Congratulations, Bradley Cooper, you took a talking raccoon and made him hilarious and surprisingly affecting. Seriously, Rocket has more emotional moments in this film than anyone else, and they are all the better for coming from the comic relief. There's also a great, small scene where Rocket breaks a bit when drunk because he can't deal with people mocking him anymore. "I never asked for this, to be experimented on and torn apart and unmade over and over and over!" he says, voice breaking, and congrats, that's how the RACCOON joins the ranks of Clint and Natasha and Bucky in terms of horrible things happening to good people who then have to deal with it after. And while the epic friendship/bromance of Rocket and Groot is funny, its also very real. Rocket's the only one who can translate the different iterations of I am Groot, and it also says a lot about this hilarious, foul-mouthed character that the one he loves and who loves him is a gentle talking tree.

*Groot

So many small, beautiful moments. Quill calls him "the giving tree" and he's not even really joking. This is a character that could have been awkward and isn't and it's so great when something comes together like that.

*Drax

He is fucking hilarious. That is all.

*Starlord/Peter Quill

Congratulations, Chris Pratt, you have made it to my Chris List with this film. Starlord is the Mal from Firefly, the man of honor in the den of thieves.

Of all things, the Guardians together *really* remind me of Firefly in a good way, because they are a found family, and they are kind of dysfunctional, but they are also just *so great* together. There's a key scene towards the end where they come together and it reminds me a bit of The Avengers, only they come together not because of a devastating loss or to save the world (although that's certainly there) but because at the end of all things, sometimes what you have to do is trust in each other. (Okay, that line is from Pacific Rim but it utterly illustrates the sequence in question.)

Some other notes:

*I love how the "Awesome Mix" soundtrack is used throughout the film in a surprisingly organic way. All of the 80s jokes are surprisingly affectionate, and it's one of those cases where nostalgia just really, really works.

*Nathan Fillion's cameo is the blue dude in the prison. He has like three lines. I wouldn't have noticed if I hadn't been listening for him like the little nerd-bat I am.

*I really, really hope the presence of the Kree are helping to set things up for Captain Marvel.

*The post-credits scene is the most meta and pure fucking gold thing I've seen in cinema outside of a Mel Brooks film.

In short: This movie is absolutely worth checking out, and likely has a fine future ahead in Saturday afternoon fodder. I am deeply happy.

ETA: One last thing: Sean Gunn--Kirk from Gilmore Girls has a small role in this film. Watching it drove me nuts to figure out who he was, and low and behold, he's James Gunn's brother. Also, apparently Gunn from Angel was named after the Gunn boys, whom Joss had worked with previously. How about a small world?
caitri: (The World is a Mess)
Snowpiercer is a movie that lives up to its (by now considerable) hype. It is gorgeous, so I highly recommend watching it in the cinema if you can; lots of work went into the details and they need to be enjoyed.

It is also dark, and fairly violent in spots (I closed my eyes in parts, and I am not typically squeamish). But that said, one thing I find particularly noteworthy after the fact is that the violence isn't gendered--unlike many (most) films there's never a point where a villain threatens a woman to appeal to the hero, etc. etc. Similarly, there is no romantic component, though there are plenty of women characters. There are also plenty of POC.

And Chris Evans. OH MY GOD. He has a long monologue towards the end and its just--it's horrifying and beautiful and real. He is such a fucking great actor and that scene just shows what he's capable of, and it breaks my heart he wants to leave acting when he can do stuff like that.

The writing. Just. This is one of those movies that so aptly demonstrates what SF as a genre can do that no other genre can. It's provocative and I can't stop thinking about it. Just. Wow.

Basically you should all go see this movie, the end.
caitri: (books)
It was funny watching these two films back to back: Scott *really* wanted to see Edge of Tomorrow, which I disliked so much I insisted we go see Maleficent asap. So.

I do not understand the good reviews Edge of Tomorrow is getting, I'm going to say that straight up front. It is tedious, trite, goes on for ages, and does nothing whatsoever interesting. No, I take it back, I liked the mecha suits: they are proof we could have an excellent Starship Troopers film if anyone ever cares to make it.

Seriously though, it is the male fantasy/fairy tale: Weeny man Tom Cruise develops masculinity through War, gains affirmation in the eyes of others, and gets rewarded with a hot girlfriend. Emily Blunt's Rita is that classic Strong Female Character in the sense that her awesomeness is there for a male reward, and it is transparent that's what she's there for in each scene in which the characters go "OMG she's with him?!" It was exhausting and nauseating, and while I don't typically hate Tom Cruise, I did want to beat him to death with a spoon after this movie.

[Has anyone on my f-list read All You Need is Kill, the Japanese book on which the film is based? I'm curious if it is better or worse, esp. with regards to sex roles.]

In contrast, Maleficent: OH MY GODS YES. This is a film I can't wait to watch with my yet unconceived daughters and any other small girl younglings. It's fun both as a transformative work--every line and beat from the original is there, flipped and changed--and as a visually nuanced film. Someone mentioned that the fairies were surely inspired by Brian Froud--yes, yes, yes! (Also, memo Disney: I would ABSOLUTELY pay to see a film of Froud's Faeries, I'm just saying.) I also love how Maleficent herself is visually coded as both devil (horns) and angel (wings); it really speaks to patriarchal Christian revisionism/co-option of goddess figures from other cultures.

Slight tangent here: I adore the modern use of fairy tale "retellings." Fairy tales themselves are a genre whose roots are specifically found in the political and proto-feminist writings of women in 17th/18th c. France and Europe. As happens, the fairy tale gained respectability when male writers--including the best known of them, Charles Perrault--began publishing fairy tales that removed and repurposed the material of the women writers. (If it sounds like what's going on with contemporary YA, YOU ARE SO RIGHT.) Fairy tales became codified by the Grimm brothers in the 19th c., who did some retooling so that the girls and princesses all became passive, the mother figures all became evil, etc. etc. Make no mistake: this was patriarchal social violence to specifically women's writing, and that's what we've been stuck with, up to and including Disney's oeuvre of the 20th c.

This is why Maleficent becomes doubly interesting, because it's a transformative text that takes on and criticizes it's original: there is a dialogue with Disney's Sleeping Beauty not just in the storytelling and visuals but within the writing itself: "This is not the story you were told" etc. etc. This is about how history transforms narratives and *especially* women's narratives with a patriarchal agenda.

Within the story itself, just, here, have bullet points:

*The symbology of feminine Nature and masculine City/Civilization. Very Margaret Mead, but even so, it absolutely works, especially in the context of "developing patriarchy.

*The symbolic rape of Maleficent: She refuses to be broken, and she maintains her power. Likewise at the end when her wings are restored. Just: I love that we have this developing cinematic language of victims reclaiming their power, when we have this insistent history in cinematic and other textual narratives that this can't happen, better off dead, etc. etc.

*Women's power is shared power. Women's relationships are about mentoring and respect. (In specific contrast to the "pixies" that have total buy-in into the patriarchy, who view women's relationships as antagonistic, etc. etc.)

*True love is the relationships of family/found family.

*The prince: TOTALLY not into dubcon. He probably saw the "1 is too many" ads and was all "I would like to use my privilege to not buy into this destructive system, thanks."

*Diaval: I love how his relationship with Maleficent develops and how he is very much the anti-Stefan. Not only is he not threatened by Maleficent's power, but that lack of fear is what makes him her friend. I love how there's the ongoing joke of he doesn't like being transformed into this or that, but when she transforms him into a dragon, not only does he use his serious newfound strength to save her (note: he doesn't have to do this, and in any other narrative where we'd have a subservient male he would be filled with hate and not try to protect her), but I think she kind of realizes his friendship and love for her, because you notice at the end his clothing has transformed into a total echo of hers: a sort of royal garment that covers him completely (versus the sort of open shirt "you're pretty" outfit he has worn the rest of the film) with a feathered shoulder-garment that looks a lot like hers. I also love how they are flying together at the end, and that she is allowing and sharing her joy of freedom with him. The more I think about it, the more I think of him as a sort of counterpart to Pacific Rim's Raleigh Beckett: he is a male nurturer--he feeds baby Aurora, he always thinks protectively/defensively rather than offensively, and most tellingly, particularly after her rape, he is a male that Maleficent actually *does* trust. His power comes from accepting strong women, not fighting them.

*I love how Aurora is coded as beautiful not just because of her physical beauty but because of her openness and love for the world. This is a baby that goes up to a woman clothed in black with horns who reeks of "OH MY GOD WHAT DO" and is like "YOU'RE SO PRETTY I LIKE YOUR FEATHERS HI!" I love how she eagerly identifies Maleficent as her fairy godmother does not come off as naive and stupid--which it could have easily done--and instead comes off as a young woman who has paid attention her whole life and knows who genuinely does love her. (Which also makes her underplayed heartbreak at her father's coldness so sad, too.) I like how Maleficent confers the crown on her at the end, because again, shared power of women, women's community and continuity, etc.

In short, IT WAS A REALLY GOOD MOVIE AND I LIKED IT A LOT.
caitri: (Cait Yatta!)
Last night we went to see Belle, a film I was very much looking forward to and was delighted to see playing in town.





Inspired by the true story of a legitimized mixed race daughter in the upper class of 18th c. England, the film flirts at being a romance even as it touches on one of the major legal stepping stones towards the abolition of slavery. After all, a woman in possession of a fortune must also be in search of a husband who isn't an utter douchebag.

Narratively, the film walks the line of "OMG there were black people in England!!!" and "be cool, there were TOTES black people in England." It doesn't always work; there's a tell-tale opening scene when a white dude in the shitty part of town picks up our young heroine and all of the white folks make goggle eyes. Like, there's only the two black people in the scene--the young girl and her aunt--but, come ON, there was a thriving community of ~250,000 blacks in London. Much later there's a scene when Belle and her cousin Elizabeth are in London for the season and Belle is struggling with combing her hair, and the black maid shows her that it's easiest to start from the ends. Which...it seems like this is the first time Belle has ever seen another black person? And I guess she's had to comb her hair the hard way for 21 years? The ONE SCENE with more than two black people in it is the climax at the end, when there are numerous black men in the balconies of the court, and NONE of them have lines, which reminded me uncomfortably of Django Unchained.

Newsflash, screenwriters: black people had a helluva lot to do with the abolitionist movement; it wasn't all just about white allies. JUST SAYIN'. (Amazing Grace is guilty of this sin too.)

I thought the film did a good job with the, ah, subtleties? flavors? of various kinds of racism too. Draco Malfoy appears as, er, Draco Malfoy--seriously, I kept waiting for him to call Belle a mudblood--who has nothing but disgust for Our Heroine, while his brother is the "nice" sort who thinks Belle's a babe and would totally be down with marrying her because she's rich and "overlook" the fact that she's brown and whatnot. Those conversations reminded me of all of the "Spock and his human mother" moments in Reboot; I was a little bit surprised that Belle actually didn't say "Live long and prosper" at the end there.

One of the things the film got very close to getting right was the friendship of Belle and Elizabeth, but even that was a little odd. Elizabeth hates that Belle can't eat with the family when company is over because reasons, and she's often sympathetic, but she is also absorbed in finding herself a husband and somehow can't tell Draco is a douche. There's also a scene where Belle is trying to explain that Draco is a douche and Elizabeth accuses her of lying and it's just an ugly, unfortunate scene that didn't really work for me on any level. It felt kind of shoved in, like someone said to the writers "you need to put some character tension in" and rather than say "you don't think 18th century mores make ENOUGH tension?!" they went ahead and did this.

Another narrative weakness was that the film never quite got at what the status of race actually WAS in ca. 1780. There's a scene where Belle asks if the black maid is a slave or not, and her uncle says that she's free and under his protection. "Like me," says Belle. Maybe a British audience would have been up on the fine points on this topic, though I doubt it, and the average American audience definitely wouldn't be. Seriously, a succinct three line paragraph at the beginning could have clarified this.

In short: it's a great film that's gorgeous, has great acting, and will hopefully be useful for having better conversations on race and history, but it also totally takes all of the easy paths of storytelling, and a complex story like this needed more.
caitri: (Steve and Bucky)
I HAVE SO MANY FEELS, YOU GUYS. It exceeded my already very high expectations. It did everything right with POC and women characters. Just asdfghjkl;!!!!!!!!!!1

Spoilers and more feels )

IN CONCLUSION: THIS IS A VERY GOOD MOVIE AND I LIKED IT A LOT.

I think it's a great movie even if you don't like superheroics and you just want espionage thriller stuff.

ETA: Scott and I were eagle-eying a lot. We're reasonably certain Steve lives somewhere in Bethesda; we're pretty sure the mall scene takes place in Friendship Heights. It's not clear where Sam lives esp with the trees but my vote goes towards somewhere in Silver Spring.

Profile

caitri: (Default)
caitri

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 01:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios