In Defense of Aca-Fans
Dec. 17th, 2010 10:45 amCandy and I have a short article on fandom and scholarship over at FlowTV.org.
Snip:
The question is still occasionally raised whether the fan academic can function objectively as a scholar while concurrently in an atmosphere of deep engagement with other fans. Is it possible or even necessary to maintain critical distance from a text while simultaneously discussing it with deep affection and even love? If one is tempted to shrug and answer, “Go ask a Trekkie,” we respond with “Go ask a Beowulf scholar.” Both texts involve a language removed from our own, a lengthy history of the text with multiple iterations and exhaustive commentary, and a tightly-knit group of followers who expect a high level of engagement and who will not tolerate sloppy errors or ignorance of the source material.
Snip:
The question is still occasionally raised whether the fan academic can function objectively as a scholar while concurrently in an atmosphere of deep engagement with other fans. Is it possible or even necessary to maintain critical distance from a text while simultaneously discussing it with deep affection and even love? If one is tempted to shrug and answer, “Go ask a Trekkie,” we respond with “Go ask a Beowulf scholar.” Both texts involve a language removed from our own, a lengthy history of the text with multiple iterations and exhaustive commentary, and a tightly-knit group of followers who expect a high level of engagement and who will not tolerate sloppy errors or ignorance of the source material.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-17 05:11 pm (UTC)You haven't read any of my fanfic, have you? <_< I actually think that in order to survive in academia you absolutely HAVE to be a fan of your area of study. If you're not, it could never be worth it in terms of the amount of time given over to it, the crap you have to put up with, etc. etc.